That is a guide that is general crafting stand-out conference paper abstracts.
So you should answer the decision for Papers? It provides recommendations for the content and presentation of this abstract, in addition to examples of the best abstracts submitted into the 2012-2013 selection that is abstract when it comes to ninth annual new york State University graduate student history conference.
Typically, an abstract describes the subject you desire to present at the conference, highlighting your argument, evidence and contribution to your historical literature. Most commonly it is restricted to 250-500 words. Your message limit can be challenging: some graduate students usually do not fret within the limit that is short hastily write and submit an abstract at the last minute, which often hurts their chances of being accepted; other students you will need to condense the Next Great American Novel into 250 words, that can easily be equally damning. Graduate students who approach the abstract early, plan accordingly, and carefully edit are the ones most often invited to provide their research. If you are intimidated because of the project, don’t be – the abstract is a form that is fairly standardized of. Proceed with the guidelines that are basic and avoid common pitfalls and you buy essay may greatly boost your abstract.
Diligently follow all style that is abstract formatting guidelines. Most CFPs will specify word or page length, as well as perhaps some layout or style guidelines. Some CFPs, however, will list very specific restrictions, including font, font size, spacing, text justification, margins, how to present quotes, simple tips to present authors and works, whether to include footnotes or otherwise not. Be sure that you strictly abide by all guidelines, including submission instructions. If a CFP will not provide abstract style and formatting guidelines, it is generally appropriate to stay around 250 words – abstract committees read many of these things plus don’t look fondly on comparatively long abstracts. Ensure that you orient your topic that is abstract to any specific CFP themes, time periods, methods, and/or buzzwords.
With a 250-500 word limit, write only what is necessary, avoiding wordiness. Use active voice and look closely at excessive phrasing that is prepositional.
Plan your abstract carefully before writing it. A good abstract will address the next questions: What is the historical question or problem? Contextualize your topic. What exactly is your thesis/argument? It should be original. What exactly is your evidence? State forthrightly that you will be using primary source material. How can your paper fit into the historiography? What’s going on in the area of study and exactly how does your paper contribute to it? How does it matter? We all know this issue is very important for your requirements, why should it is crucial that you the selection committee that is abstract?
You ought to be as specific that you can, avoiding overly broad or overreaching statements and claims. And that’s it: don’t get sidetracked by writing way too much narrative or over explaining. Say what you ought to say and absolutely nothing more.
Maintain your audience in mind. How background that is much give on a subject is determined by the conference. Is the conference an over-all humanities conference, a general graduate student history conference, or something like that more specific like a 1960s social revolutions conference? Your pitch must be worthy of the specificity associated with conference: the more specific the subject, the less background that is broad need certainly to give and vice versa.
Revise and edit your abstract to ensure that its final presentation is error free. The editing phase can also be the time that is best to visit your abstract as a whole and chip away at unnecessary words or phrases. The draft that is final be linear and clear also it should read smoothly. If you are tripping over something while reading, the abstract selection committee will as well. Ask another graduate student to see your abstract to ensure its clarity or attend a Graduate Student Writing Group meeting.
Your language ought to be professional as well as your style should stay glued to academic standards. Contractions might be appealing because of the word limits, however they ought to be avoided. If citation guidelines are not specifically given, it really is appropriate to use the name that is author’s title of work (in either italics or quotation marks) in the text rather than use footnotes or in-text citations.
While one question, if really good, can be posed in your abstract, you should avoid writing more than one (maybe two, if really really good). If you do pose a concern or two, make sure that you either answer it or address why the question matters to your conference paper – unless you’re posing an evident rhetorical question, you shouldn’t just let a question hang there. A lot of questions takes up a lot of space and leaves less room for you to build your argument, methods, evidence, historiography, etc. quite often, posing too many questions leaves the abstract committee wondering if you are going to handle one or all in your paper and when you even understand the answers in their mind. Remember, you’re not likely to have previously written your conference paper, but you are anticipated to own done enough research that you can adequately cover in 15-20 minutes that you are prepared to write about a specific topic. Prove that you have inked so.
Language that will help you be as specific as you can in presenting your argument is fantastic but don’t ensure you get your readers bogged down in jargon. They’ll certainly be reading a lot of abstracts and will not want to wade through the language that is unnecessary. Ensure that it it is simple.
When students repeat claims, they often don’t realize these are generally doing this. Sometimes this occurs because students are not yet clear on the argument. Think about it even more and then write. Other times, students write carelessly and do not proofread. Make certain each sentence is exclusive and that it contributes to the flow of the abstract.
The abstract committee does not need to be reminded of this grand sweep of history in order to contextualize your topic. Place your topic specifically within the historiography.
The samples below represent the five highest scoring samples submitted to the selection committee for the ninth annual graduate student history conference, 2012-2013. Two for the samples below were subsequently selected for publication in the NC State Graduate Journal of History. Outstanding papers presented in the graduate student history conference are recommended for publication by panel commentators. Papers go through a peer review process before publication.